From The Top Down
What is linkbait?
Link bait is content developed to attract links as its primary
goal.
All good content can and usually will act as linkbait, but
the best content is developed first as value for an audience
and being linkbait is usually justan ancillary benefit instead
of the primary goal.
How do you tell people who don't want to hear it too stop
the madness? Top lists are the pits. I know that nearly every
internet marketer alive has read a top list for creating linkbait
and I guarantee that the top list encouraged told them to create
a top list of their own.
The truth is top lists have become over saturated as a product
and are also now viewed mostly as watered down content. Is a
single sentence or two really all that useful? These days most
top lists don't even link to another resource that can assist
a reader in learning more. In fact top lists have become so
prevalent yet so intellectually useless that I am surprised
that more users haven't tuned out already, or have they?
"I hereby claim that content can be both white-hat and yet still
be wonderful "bait" for links. And generating information or
ideas that people talk about is a surefire way to generate links."
This is a quote from the Google engineer Matt
Cutts when discussing linkbait on his blog.
Now before we get too far into this conversation, I have to
come clean, I have used this technique before when authoring
articles for other blogs. You can find an example of my thoughtlessness
here: 10
Questions to Ask Before Starting a Viral Marketing Campaign.
The point being, even I wasn't immune to being attracted to
writing a top 10 list about someone else's top 10 list. Many
other popular authors have also referenced the use of top lists
when suggesting ways to create linkbait. See Seth
Godin and the SEOmoz
blog just to name two. Many others have also used top lists
successfully as linkbait and most likely will continue to do
so until those lists no longer generate a return.
Here is the thing about this technique. A top list written by
Robert Scoble, such as this one here: Top
10 Facebook Apps, will work better and be of greater value
to Robert than it would have been to you or I because Robert
sits near the top of the blogging world and has an audience
of tens of thousands or more on a daily basis. Had you or I
written an article similar to this, I can almost guarantee it
would have been a failure from a linkbaiting perspective.
Ten items each with a single sentence or two about them, no
links to actually go get the applications being referenced,
and a single sentence asking his audience which apps they like.
For Robert this post was successful on multiple levels, he was
able to get a link back from TechCrunch.com, links from a few
hundred sources, and probably more important to Robert, feedback
from his audience on potential apps he might be missing. For
you or I it would have been a colossal flop and here is why.
Odds are you and I aren't "A" list bloggers so the chances of
getting a link from a resource like TechCrunch.com
are slim, okay call it none, since the TechCrunch.com authors
would have probably missed our list or had they seen it, probably
concluded our audience wasn't large enough to be worth linking
back too. The odds that we would have a distribution or audience
the size of Robert's is also slim so we would most likely only
generate an extremely small percentage of the overall links
Robert did and Robert didn't get all that many links. Finally
if we wrote our article purely as linkbait the actually usefulness
of the feedback is most likely not something we would see as
overly valuable.
So if I am telling you it won't work why do so many individuals
keep writing top lists? I believe the answer is pretty basic.
Most top lists will generate a link or even three and they require
minimal effort for that tiny return. Top lists are simple to
produce as they usually consist of an amalgamation of ideas
that have already been poked, prodded, and debated to death.
When something is really easy to produce like a top list individuals
will continue to generate them until they actually achieve a
negative return and unfortunately I still think we are still
just a bit short of reaching that point. Still I think we will
get there quickly. I believe Eric
Lander may have said it best.
"Similarly, the more linkbait is tried, the more tiring unoriginal
ideas become. I think this sums up part of the problem, there
is a serious lack of originality to top lists in most cases."
Finally just to top off this post, I will pull an item from
my favorite top 10 list entitled Top
10 lists suck!
1. Fast food blogging
"I once heard a comedian compare KFC to porn… you enjoy
it in the moment, but afterwards you feel all dirty and greasy.
Top 10 lists are the KFC of the blogging world to me. Mass produced
and not terribly good for you. In fact… they'll probably make
you fat. A handful of bloggers still manage to come up with
insightful Top 10 lists. However, most are simply re-hashing
old ideas for the masses."
I felt obligated to reference this list because the idea of
Fast Food blogging seemed to resonate as the ultimate description
of what top lists have become.





